[Click To Enlarge]
Email A Friend - Gift Reminder |
Two Gigahertz Low-Loss RF Splitters for TV & Satellite MKII - 2 Way 2 GigaHertz RF Splitter
Availability:
In Stock
Price:
$24.95
$13.24*
|
| Part No: | B000Y97Q86 |
| Manufacturer: | Monster |
| MFG Part: | TGHZ-2RF MKII |
| Customer Rating: | 4.0 / 5.0 |
|
|
- Ultra Low-Loss Design in Monster?s Best Splitter for TV and Satellite Signals.
- 5MHz - 2 GHz bandwidth is digital ready for splitting TV signals.
- Internal impedance matching network for accurate 75-ohm load to all outputs.
- Precision die-cast 24k gold-plated chassis.
- Advanced PC board construction for absolute minimal insertion loss.
Item #: Q96864. Enjoy the convenience and flexibility of accurately separating high-bandwidth TV signals to multiple components. Now you can share a single line for your Cable TV and Internet service or even split over-the air HD (digital TV) antenna signals. Precise internal impedance matching and 24k gold center contacts maximize signal integrity and picture quality. Product Description: Monster Cable Two Gigahertz Low-Loss TGHZ-2RF MKII - antenna splitter
Cable: Antenna splitter
Left Connector(s): F connector - female
Right Connector(s): F connector - female
Additional Features: Gold-plated connectors
Customers also search for: Discount Monster Cable Two Gigahertz Low-Loss TGHZ-2RF MKII - Antenna Splitter, Buy Monster Cable Two Gigahertz Low-Loss TGHZ-2RF MKII - Antenna Splitter, Wholesale Monster Cable Two Gigahertz Low-Loss TGHZ-2RF MKII - Antenna Splitter, 0050644455933, 127773, Miscellaneous MP3 Accessories
| Splitter???? More Like A Duplicator!!!!!!!! | 2010-03-18 | 5 / 5 |
|
Can't tell a difference in signal. This IZ tha best I've ever used..I'm about to believe that the picture got better after the split..I used Belkin Pure AV RF cables with this Gold Nugget.
This is more than just a 2 or 4 dollar splitter..This has a Computer Chip inside that has (In My Opinion) duplicated the signal....Truly A Monster.. |
| Works great | 2010-02-24 | 4 / 5 |
|
| Needed a high end splitter for splitting for a cable modem and video. This little guy was expensive but works great. |
| Very Satisfied | 2010-01-19 | 5 / 5 |
|
I bought this to replace an old crusty splitter I had for ages. I'm glad to get rid of that ugly thing.
The picture I get is just as good as the signal I get when I hook up the cable directly to the TV. I see no loss of signal strength. Overall, I'm very satisfied. |
| Good build quality - not much performance advantage | 2009-07-29 | 3 / 5 |
|
I've been having problems with my cable signal, and I tried a few of these splitters to see if that's where the problem was occurring. Replaced the 15 year old, cable TV company supplied splitter with the Monster, and while it certainly seems to be a more robust product, in the end I saw no performance difference.
Indeed, my cable modem (Motorola) has a diagnostic mode where it can display the strength of the incoming signal. I measured it on the old splitter, switched to the Monster - and see exactly zero difference.
Still, considering that my local electronics store no-name brand is about $15, I don't feel bad paying a few dollars more for the Monster product. It certainly seems more rugged, and I doubt I'd ever have to replace it again.
Bottom line is I'm sure it's doing what it's supposed to, but there's no magic to be had by simply swapping out a splitter. |
| Works Great! | 2009-04-15 | 5 / 5 |
|
I have a VOIP phone connected to a router on an Internet connection that was split with the Cable TV. The problem was that my phone wasn't working properly--my voice kept cutting out to the person I was talking to.
After determining the problem was with my Internet connection, it was further determined that the phone worked fine when I removed the splitter that I had, took the TV out of the mix, and plugged the Internet connection directly into the jack in the wall. So the problem was either going to be with the splitter or there just wasn't enough bandwidth to deal with a TV, Internet, and VOIP phone.
I bought this splitter to see if replacing the splitter would solve the problem. I plugged the sucker in and packet loss is now zero. It's all good. Best $20 I ever spent. |
)
